Finally, statisticians measure other facial features to determine symmetry and proportion. If the numbers are equal, a person is considered more beautiful.Ĭ. Schmid measures three segments of the face-from the forehead hairline to a spot between the eyes, from between the eyes to the bottom of the nose, and from the bottom of the nose to the bottom of the chin. The ideal result-as defined by the golden ratio-is roughly 1.6, which means a beautiful person's face is about 1 1/2 times longer than it is wide.ī. Then, she divides the length by the width. ![]() Schmid measures the length and width of the face. These measurements are calculated to determine a person's beauty on a scale of 1 to 10. Kendra Schmid, an assistant professor of biostatistics, uses the golden ratio and 29 other measurements to study facial sex appeal. Thousands of years later, scientists adopted this mathematical formula to help explain why some people are considered beautiful…and others are not.ĭr. Phi, named after Phidias the greek sculptor who made the Parthenon statues conforming to the ratio, is the simple mathematical ratio 1.618, it is the code of beauty and is present throughout all living things.During the European Renaissance, renowned artists and architects used an equation known as the "golden ratio" to map out their masterpieces. In fact, it is probably fair to say that the Golden Ratio has inspired thinkers of all disciplines like no other number in the history of mathematics. Biologists, artists, musicians, historians, architects, economists, astronomers, psychologists, and even mystics have debated the basis of its ubiquity and appeal. But the fascination with the Golden Ratio is not confined just to mathematicians. Some of the greatest mathematical minds of all ages, from Pythagoras and Euclid in ancient Greece, through the medieval Italian mathematician Leonardo of Pisa and the Renaissance astronomer Johannes Kepler, to present-day scientific figures such as Oxford physicist Roger Penrose, have spent endless hours over this simple ratio and its properties. The golden ratio (Phi) has fascinated western intellectuals of diverse interests for at least 2,400 years. PHI, THE GOLDEN NUMBER OR DIVINE PROPORTION Traditional facelift techniques can only tighten the underlying muscles in a backwards 45º vector, necessitating secondary procedures to alter midfacial volume – lower eyelid surgery or fat transfer – but to address midfacial volume shift, a more vertical vector is key (more later). This is at the expense of the middle facial third – the area between the eyebrows and the nostrils – which become sunken, hollow and skeletal.įillers and implants can “replace” this volume and create an illusion of youthful midfacial fullness, but this does not address where that volume has gone to! When I perform a facelift, I am looking to resite native volume back to where it came from, not just replace it with borrowed (fat) volume and or artificial fillers. This sagging leads to panfacial volume shift, with the skin, fat and muscle volume collecting in the lower facial third (jowls and neck). So with the proliferation of injectable fillers and volumisation as a contemporary buzzword, what is it we are actually treating? As we age, our facial skin becomes thinner, less elastic and sags under gravity and exposure. When treatments are used responsibly and for a specific aim the results can be very good. The non-surgical market is booming however and for good reason. Honest initial advice would have saved them time, money and risk. ![]() Every week I meet patients who have wasted £1000s on disappointing or equivocal non-surgical results having been initially dissuaded from surgery. These treatments are certainly effective for the right (minor ageing) indications but claims need to be backed by hard evidence and a candid discussion had about their limitations. Relative “demedicalisation” of cosmetic procedures, an increasing consumer drive for fast track and minimal downtime results has led some practitioners to offer ‘lunch hour and non-surgical facelifts” This is irresponsible to prospective patients as at times the marketing can be compelling. There are now far too many facial treatments out there promising the impossible, it’s easy to see how this happened. The key is to directly address the causes of the aged appearance in anatomical layers. Excess skin and fat deposits in the face and neck need to be removed surgically – threads, fillers and machines don’t cut it. Over filling a descended face will make it look puffy and grotesque, a face that is significantly deflated will look pulled and tight if lifted only. A beautiful rejuvenation can only be achieved if natural structure and form is respected.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |